Terms Glossary

Good Party's Terms Glossary is a list of definitions of words from the political and elections world. These terms are from an independent's perspective with an eye toward reform. If you have a suggestion for a new definition, send it to ask@goodparty.org.

Web 3.0

Web 3.0 is the term used to describe the development of the internet as a platform to facilitate more independent and decentralized forms of online activity. It is a movement toward promoting a more democratic, open-source, and transparent online experience. It involves the use of cryptography and other technologies to ensure data privacy, reduce censorship, and increase the security of digital interactions. Web 3.0 also seeks to create a more level playing field for all users, with a focus on open access to data, allowing more equal access to information and services. Examples of Web 3.0 include blockchain-enabled distributed ledgers, which are used to record and validate digital transactions, as well as peer-to-peer networks, which are used to share data and resources across a decentralized network. Ultimately, Web 3.0 is a movement toward a more democratic and open internet, one which will offer citizens more control over their online activity and enable more independent candidates to emerge in the political landscape.

Write-In Candidate

A write-in candidate is someone who runs for office but does not have their name on the ballot. Instead, voters have to physically write in the candidate's name on the ballot. Write-in candidates are often used as a last-minute alternative when a desired candidate did not make it through the primary or didn't qualify for the ballot.

In the United States, the rules for write-in candidates vary from state to state. Some states do not allow write-in candidates, while others have strict rules about how their names must be written on the ballot. For example, in some states, the write-in candidate must file paperwork before the election, while in others, the candidate doesn't have to do anything.

Despite the challenges, write-in candidates can be a powerful tool for voters looking for an alternative to the major party candidates. In the 2010 Alaska US Senate race, Lisa Murkowski was defeated in the primary but ran as a write-in candidate and ultimately won the general election. Additionally, in certain elections, write-in candidates can be a useful tool for protest votes, or for voters who want to vote for someone who does not appear on the ballot.

Write-in candidates are a unique aspect of the democratic process, giving voters more options and allowing for unexpected outcomes. They can be a powerful tool for voters looking for an alternative to the major party candidates, or for those who want to express their dissatisfaction with the current choices. They can also be a useful tool for protest votes and for voters who want to vote for someone who does not appear on the ballot.